American Invest Hub
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Business
  • Latest News

American Invest Hub

  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Business
  • Latest News
Politics

Top Dem’s past push for noncitizen voting rights revealed ahead of House vote

by admin May 25, 2024
May 25, 2024
Top Dem’s past push for noncitizen voting rights revealed ahead of House vote

A senior House Democrat previously advocated for noncitizen participation in the U.S. election system, arguing that the framers of the U.S. Constitution did not ‘intend’ for a citizenship requirement to vote, Fox News Digital has learned.

It comes as the House gears up to vote on a bill that would repeal a local law in Washington, D.C., granting noncitizen residents of the city the right to vote in local elections. 

The bill advanced through the House Oversight Committee in a 23-19 vote last summer and is expected for a House floor vote Thursday afternoon.

Among the Democrats who opposed it was Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the Oversight Committee’s ranking member, who authored a 1993 paper for the American University Washington College of Law, ‘Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: The Historical Constitutional and Theoretical Meanings of Alien Suffrage.’

‘In this Article, I will argue that the current blanket exclusion of noncitizens from the ballot is neither constitutionally required nor historically normal. Moreover, the disenfranchisement of aliens at the local level is vulnerable to deep theoretical objections since resident aliens — who are governed, taxed, and often drafted just like citizens — have a strong democratic claim to being considered members, indeed citizens, of their local communities,’ Raskin wrote in the paper.

In another section of the paper, Raskin noted that the Founding Fathers considered citizenship terms for officeholders in the White House and Congress but did not include the same for voters.

‘It can be safely concluded from the juxtaposition of the Framers’ specific and varying constitutional conditions for federal office-holding and their complete silence as to a citizenship qualification for federal voting that they did not intend to create a U.S. citizenship suffrage qualification,’ he wrote.

On the specific amendments that attach the word ‘citizen’ when describing voting rights, Raskin wrote, ‘If such language is not designed to exclude aliens from voting, perhaps it discloses a general understanding that voting is for citizens only. But this reading is badly strained: the language specifies only that states may not exclude any citizen from the franchise on the basis of race, not that the states may not include non-citizens in the franchise.’

He also argued that giving noncitizens the right to vote would have no bearing on their own naturalization process.

‘The simple right to vote in local elections, or even state and federal elections, neither confers U.S. citizenship for federal purposes nor immunizes aliens against the operation of any provision of immigration or naturalization law,’ Raskin wrote.

Raskin told Fox News Digital that he still stands by his belief in noncitizens voting in local elections but pointed out that it’s illegal on the federal level.

‘I stand by my academic conclusion that the Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that there’s nothing in the Constitution that prohibits non-citizens from voting in local elections. As a matter of public policy, localities have every reason to decide for themselves. Most states have allowed noncitizen voting at some point in their history and any attempt to demonize local noncitizen voting today is strange for Republicans given that they strongly supported this practice in the 19th century. Non-citizen voting in federal elections is against the law and not at issue in tomorrow’s vote,’ Raskin said.

The city of Takoma Park, which Raskin represents, shared a press release in October celebrating ’30 years of non-citizen voting’ in local elections.

The House’s D.C. noncitizens voting bill was introduced by Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas. Under a provision known as home rule, Congress is afforded the ability to block laws passed by the D.C. council.

Even if passed, however, it’s highly unlikely that the Democrat-controlled Senate takes it up.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Experts question RFK Jr.’s sudden ‘bizarre’ medical claims that include brain worms, mercury poisoning
next post
DOJ’s Inspector General takes heat for allegedly ‘targeting political opponents’

Related Posts

Mother of Hamas hostage says US shouldn’t be...

May 14, 2024

China retaliatory tariffs add to Intel woes; QCOM...

April 6, 2025

Alina Habba accuses Kamala Harris of ‘committing a...

August 1, 2024

FIRST ON FOX: Biden gets boost from major...

May 10, 2024

Crypto watch LATAM: Honduras warns against Bitcoin while...

April 6, 2025

Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs: here’s how countries...

February 10, 2025

5 steps toward a fresh approach to health...

February 22, 2024

Flashback: Harris proposed middle class tax increase for...

August 1, 2024

US restricts staff in Israel from traveling outside...

April 13, 2024

Conservative groups are pushing Speaker Johnson to reform...

March 1, 2024

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest News

    • Interview: Strategic location gives Brazil Potash cost advantage in domestic fertiliser market, says CEO Matt Simpson

      June 1, 2025
    • Canada’s Q1 GDP expands by 2.2%, driven by exports spike ahead of potential US tariffs

      June 1, 2025
    • President Trump to host farewell for Elon Musk as DOGE leader steps away

      June 1, 2025
    • UK’s digital banks face divergent fortunes: Starling stumbles, Monzo and Revolut soars

      June 1, 2025
    • Trump wants Apple to shift iPhone production from India to the US: here’s what it means

      May 18, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (3,022)
    • Investing (2,459)
    • Latest News (1,994)
    • Politics (1,530)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: americaninvesthub.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 americaninvesthub.com | All Rights Reserved