SpaceX’s Starship explodes in test: what went wrong with Elon Musk’s rocket?

The latest SpaceX Starship prototype test ended in failure, with the rocket breaking apart minutes after launch from Texas on Thursday.

The mishap marks a significant setback for Elon Musk’s ambitious plans to revolutionise space travel.

While test flights are an essential part of developing cutting-edge technology, this incident has reignited questions about the feasibility of the Starship programme meeting its lofty objectives.

Beyond the dramatic visuals of falling debris over the Gulf of Mexico, the implications of this failure stretch into regulatory scrutiny, industry competition, and SpaceX’s operational goals.

What caused the SpaceX Starship crash?

SpaceX’s Starship, the largest and most powerful rocket ever built, had been carrying a test payload of mock satellites when it lost communication with mission control just eight minutes after liftoff.

The upgraded upper stage, touted as a “new generation ship,” was designed to showcase improved capabilities, including more efficient engines and enhanced structural integrity.

However, preliminary analyses suggest an internal liquid oxygen leak caused a pressure build-up, resulting in a catastrophic breakup.

This anomaly not only disrupted SpaceX’s plans for a controlled splashdown in the Indian Ocean but also led to significant air traffic diversions in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which oversees private space launches, swiftly imposed temporary flight restrictions.

What does this mean for SpaceX and the space race?

The failure comes at a pivotal time for SpaceX. The company has ambitious plans to conduct at least 12 Starship launches annually, targeting Mars exploration, satellite deployment, and long-term space habitation.

However, setbacks like this threaten to derail its aggressive timeline.

Each mishap invites heightened scrutiny from regulators, particularly the FAA, which is expected to launch a thorough investigation into whether debris impacted areas outside the designated hazard zone.

Moreover, the timing of the failure is notable as Blue Origin, the rival space company founded by Jeff Bezos, successfully launched its New Glenn rocket into orbit a day earlier.

This juxtaposition sharpens the competitive edge of the private space race, where delays or failures can erode investor confidence and industry standing.

For Musk, who has criticised regulatory agencies in the past for stifling innovation, the incident is a stark reminder of the challenges inherent in balancing rapid development with safety protocols.

While SpaceX has built a reputation on its “test-to-failure” approach, the public and financial stakes grow higher with each misstep.

Thursday’s incident reflects the inherent risks of SpaceX’s iterative design philosophy, where prototypes are pushed to their limits to identify weaknesses.

This approach, though responsible for many of the company’s breakthroughs, raises questions about its scalability as the stakes of each launch increase.

Unlike earlier failures that occurred during relatively novel phases of testing, this anomaly emerged in a flight stage SpaceX had previously navigated successfully.

Adding to the pressure, SpaceX’s commitments extend beyond the Starship programme.

Its Falcon 9 rockets remain a cornerstone of satellite deployment and crewed missions to the International Space Station.

Any prolonged delays or investigations into Starship could divert resources and impact the company’s broader operational goals.

The path forward will depend on how quickly SpaceX can identify and address the root cause of this failure. The FAA’s involvement will likely influence the timeline for subsequent tests, with regulatory clearance serving as a potential bottleneck.

The post SpaceX’s Starship explodes in test: what went wrong with Elon Musk’s rocket? appeared first on Invezz